Who do we blame for AA/BEE?

Back in 1977 there was a black man by the name of Rev. Leon Sullivan, he was a board member of GM Motors, at the time the biggest employer of black people in South Africa. Of course he was not a South African black but was an American black. Judging by the quote below he seems to think he was the saviour of blacks in South Africa.

"Starting with the work place, I tightened the screws step by step and raised the bar step by step. Eventually I got to the point where I said that companies must practice corporate civil disobedience against the laws and I threatened South Africa and said in two years Mandela must be freed, apartheid must end, and blacks must vote or else I'll bring every American company I can out of South Africa"

Bear in mind this was in 1977 so he didn't quite achieve his objective, we can safely say these principles were quite a failure considering it wasn't until the 1990's when things began to change. So without further ado...

1. Non-segregation of the races in all eating, comfort, and work facilities. Equal and fair employment practices for all employees.
2. 
   Equal pay for all employees doing equal or comparable work for the same period of time.
3. 
   Initiation of and development of training programs that will prepare, in substantial numbers, blacks and other nonwhites for supervisory, administrative, clerical, and technical jobs.
4. 
   Increasing the number of blacks and other nonwhites in management and supervisory positions.
5. 
   Improving the quality of life for blacks and other nonwhites outside the work environment in such areas as housing, transportation, school, recreation, and health facilities.
6. 
   Working to eliminate laws and customs that impede social, economic, and political justice. (added in 1984)

Needless to say since they were a failure of course the U.N. decided in 1999 to not abandon them, but to embelish on them and create a new set of principles for the global stage. If you want top know more, go read up on them. Suffice to say the father of AA/BEE has the blood and welfare of thousands of white South Africans on his hands.

United Nations Security Council Resolutions...(Crimes against white South Africans)

These are just some of the crimes the U.N. committed against the white people of South Africa.

United Security Council Resolution 181
adopted on August 7 1963, was concerned with an arms build-up by the Republic of South Africa and fears that those arms might be used to further the racial conflict in that country. The Council called upon the government of South Africa to abandon its policy of apartheid and called upon all states to voluntarily cease the sale and shipment of all arms, ammunition and other military equipment to South Africa.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 191
adopted on June 18, 1964, after reiterating its previous requests of the Republic of South Africa and again condemning apartheid the Council decided to establish a Group of Experts made up of representatives of all the then current members of the Council to study the feasibility and effectiveness of measures which could be taken by the Council under the Charter. The Council also invited the Secretary-General to establish education and training programs for South Africans abroad.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 282
adopted on July 23, 1970, concerned by violations of the arms embargo passed against South Africa in resolution 191 the Council reiterated its total opposition to the policies of apartheid and reaffirmed its previous resolutions on the topic. The Council called upon states to strengthen the arms embargo by ceasing the provision of military training to members of the South African armed forces and by taking appropriate action to give effective to the resolution's measures.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 418
passed on 4 November 1977, imposed a mandatory arms embargo against apartheid South Africa. This resolution differed from the earlier Resolution 282, which was only voluntary. The embargo was subsequently tightened and extended by Resolution 591.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 435
Adopted on September 29, 1978, this resolution put forward proposals for a cease-fire and UN-supervised elections in South Africa controlled South-West Africa which ultimately led to the independence of Namibia. Importantly, it established the United Nations Transition Assistance Group (UNTAG) which oversaw the election and the South African withdrawal.
One of the subsequent shortcomings of the resolution was that it did not mention the paramilitary Koevoet force, which came into being after the resolution was passed. This unit, which was considered a stumbling block for free elections in Namibia, was eventually disbanded on October 31, 1989 — the last possible day before the November election.
On December 22, 1988 South Africa agreed to implement the resolution upon its signature of the Tripartite Accord at UN headquarters in New York.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 591
strengthened the mandatory arms embargo against apartheid South Africa imposed by United Nations Security Council Resolution 418 and made it more comprehensive.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1761
The resolution deemed apartheid and the policies enforcing it to be a violation of South Africa's obligations under the UN Charter and a threat to international peace and security. Additionally, the resolution requested Member States to break off diplomatic relations with South Africa, to cease trading with South Africa (arms exports in particular), and to deny passage to South African ships and aircraft.

A Call to Arms

South African Peoples Liberation Organisation

How do we handle Apartheid 2.0?

For a few years now I’ve wondered how white South Africans could dig themselves out of the shit-hole that the Black Marxist ANC has created. Of course there are options, like emigrating to a predominantly white country (Read USA, U.K, Australia, New Zealand, and really most of Europe). This of course is not without it’s pitfalls as we all know.

Firstly you would need to qualify for emigration. In order to qualify for most countries you need to meet two basic criteria. The first is financial, you need to show your potential new country of settlement that you can support yourself without the help of the host country’s social welfare system and secondly your job and or qualifications should be sufficient enough to show that you can make a positive contribution to said host country. Of course this is over simplified as each country differs to a degree but the gist is the same.

The problem here is due to the current economic downturn and the racist policy of AA/BEE. Due to this policy it is increasingly difficult for a white South African to get a job and then subsequently make enough money in order to emigrate. This of course is a double edged sword since without a job you cannot gain the experience required.

Not every average white South African has the means to emigrate, nor does the average white South African have the intention to emigrate. Why should they? South Africa is just as much their country as everyone else’s. If not more so, but that’s a post for a different day.

The only other option left open to white South Africans is to stay put and continue being victims of the atrocities carried out against them, or to stand up and fight. Not in the literal sense of the word (At first anyway) but to show the world that they are being discriminated against and are being targeted by black people in crime situations. The problem is however, how do they go about doing so, without any or at least as little bloodshed as possible?

So many questions that need to be answered, so many answers to those questions but which answers match up to which questions? That’s the hard part. How do we as white South Africans make the world realise that they have made a grave mistake by removing one form of apartheid and substituted it with another form of apartheid only worse? How can we loosen the Marxist grip of those controlling our beloved country? How do we ensure that white Africans will continue to survive and thrive in Africa?

So many questions, so little time to answer them in. At best we have five to ten years before South Africa implodes and becomes another failed state, at worst we have maybe two. Why only two years? Next year is the World Cup, the government would dare not do anything too drastic before or during the world cup, simply because if it's taken away from them they will have lost another opportunity to enrich themselves and their comrades. Two years because for a year after the world cup the pigs will still have the ability to feed at the trough, it's when this pig feed runs out when white South Africans will have to be on their highest alert. In 10-15 years time Nelson Mandela will be dead, that will be the catalyst for the ANC/Marxist extremists to start discriminating on a grander scale.

How do we make the world aware of what's happening in South Africa?

Just how did the previously oppressed make the world aware of what was happening in South Africa? Yes the world knew but how did the terrorists ensure they had the entire world’s backing? They used the press, and they used politicians. All we need to do is maintain a constant onslaught of letters to the press which includes papers, magazines, and television, as well as that we need to bombard politicians from around the world. (In a future post I’ll be putting up the email addresses, and mail addresses of most of the MP’s in Britain, and hopefully a few other countries).

These letters need to be concise, to the point and polite stating why we think we are being discriminated against, the case for our right to have our own homeland that is not blighted by the African/Marxist mindset. Not only do we need to educate the world we need to start re-educating white South Africa, to start making people proud of being white again, to be proud of our long African heritage and to be proud of all the things we have accomplished in Africa. We need to start providing white people alternative sources for news, news that has not been filtered by the MSM news that has not been censored. We need ordinary people to start reporting on news events and then making them publicly available on the internet (via Youtube, blogs etc). We also need to begin archiving all crimes committed against white people, we need to start documenting all this proof so that we can present to the world our case for a white homeland in Africa for ALL white Africans (Rhodesian, Namibian, Kenyan etc). Along with this we need to show the world that our basic human rights are being infringed upon.

How do we ensure the survival of the last white culture in South Africa whilst at the same time loosening the Marxist grip?

For too long now white south Africans have sat back and let things happen, for the greater good. while commendable, the time has now come to realise our mistakes and to start actively doing something about the hole we have dug for ourselves. it is blatantly obvious that all is not well with the current climate in South Africa. even the blacks have started to get annoyed that the promises that have been made to them by the ANC over the last 40 years have been nothing but lies. The ANC has had over 40 years to drum home the message that the white man is evil and has in turn created a sense of entitlement for the masses. we do not have the luxury of time.

White South Africans now need to start looking after their own. Just for starters i thought I'd list a few ways in which we can do so.

First stop where it is possible we need to start employing white people and white people only. There are thousands of white people who need jobs as they've been forced out of the job market by the illegal, racist AA/BEE policies of the government. Those of us who own our own companies should start ignoring AA/BEE where possible, I know this is a little more difficult for bigger companies but we need to start "empowering" our own. If possible we need to start making these companies smaller, in order to not fall foul of these policies, easier said than done i know but it is after all for our survival.

Those people who are self employed and who own their own companies should now stop deducting PAYE etc off of their white employees payslips, those self same companies should stop paying their tax contributions too. yes this will lead to prosecution but we all have to be brave sometime we need to start fighting and hitting the government where it hurts most, in the pocket. Once the money starts running out for them to buy expensive luxury cars and houses they may start to take notice, but I doubt it. White citizens ALL need to stop paying their municipal rates and taxes directly and join rate payers associations etc and only hand over the money when services are restored to the acceptable standards last seen during the first version of apartheid. They weren't perfect but at least they were a damn sight better than they are these days. For people to act alone it will be easy for the government to target them, in bigger groups it will be more difficult.

White people need to start protecting themselves and policing their own communities by forming competent neighbourhood policing units. White people need to start prosecuting criminals and dishing out civilized and justifiable punishments to those criminals who rape, steal, rob and murder. We have lawyers, we have ex-judges, we have ex-policemen, it can be done, and can be done large scale. once the black savages see we are no longer welcome mats they will stop targeting law abiding civilized whites. To help we need to start living in white only communities, with gated communities we are half way there, we need to start building white only communities again so we can claw back our culture, our civilized way of life.

The SADF was once one of the most feared and disciplined forces in Africa, if not the world. We need to start mobilising the brave men who once served our country with pride. Those men who bravely protected our borders and towns to stop the scourge of Communism from taking our coutry away from us.

We need to start educating our children correctly and to a high standard, to form at-home schools in small cells, there are plenty of white teachers who would gladly go back into teaching. To start teaching our children the real history of our country, untouched by liberal hands.

The boycotting of all black owned businesses where possible, to buy from white business even straight from farmers to give them a chance at survival.

We need to start youth clubs where our children can be taught about survival skill, discipline and pride of heritage.

I'm sure there are plenty of other ways we can ensure our survival not only for the present but for the future and i look forward to reccomendations from readers.

The Freedom Charter, con of the century...almost.

The Freedom Charter is a document outlining the principles of the ANC. It's a pretty famous document, one that can be found on the ANC's website. How the world accepted it without protest I cannot believe, having a quick read through it, it becomes very apparent that it leans towards Marxist/Communist principles. Of course this comes as no suprise since all you need to do is take a look at the Axis of Evil that controls South Africa's government. For those not in the know. The ruling party is made up of three different organisations and they are the ANC, SACP (South African Communist Party) and COSATU (Confederation of South African Trade Unions). I suppose that should give a clue as to their intentions for the future of South Africa.

Anyhow I digress, what I wanted to do is show the hypocrisy of the document in todays context. I'm not going to do a copy/paste job of the document here in the post just follow the link above, I'm just going to outline various areas to get my point across and to show that the government needs to do one of two things. They either need to renounce the document and carry on the path that they are already on, or they need to change the path they are on and actually follow the principles that they set out on 26th June 1955.

The bolded bits are the statements within the charter:

And therefore, we, the people of South Africa, black and white together equals, countrymen and brothers adopt this Freedom Charter.

One quick look at South Africa will show you that black and white are not equal. Policies such as AA/BEE are not for the equal benefit of all. The majority of white people in South Africa are taxpayers, the majority of black people are not taxpayers. The whites therefore are funding the welfare of the blacks. Certainly not an equal stand point.

Every man and woman shall have the right to vote for and to stand as a candidate for all bodies which make laws;

Explain to me then why certain political parties in South Africa had to fight for expats (most of whom are still South African) to vote, it had to go as far as the Constitutional court.

The rights of the people shall be the same, regardless of race, colour or sex;

Again I grumble the words AA/BEE.

All people shall have equal right to use their own languages, and to develop their own folk culture and customs;

Why then are the Afrikaaners being persecuted for being Afrikaans? Read genocide of farmers. Why is it unacceptable to develop areas where people of the same culture can live together in harmony, without the influence of other cultures?

All national groups shall be protected by law against insults to their race and national pride;

Why then are we white South Africans being persecuted for the wrongs of Apartheid 1.0? Why can people like the leader of the ANCYL make comments like he does? Why was Madiba allowed to sing songs about killing white people? Why was Peter Mokaba then allowed to sing "Kill the boer, kill the farmer"? Why are we not allowed to use our old flag Oranje, Blanje Blou as OUR symbol of national pride?

The preaching and practice of national, race or colour discrimination and contempt shall be a punishable crime;

See above, why is it ok for various people to preach about discrimination of the white man, and not be punished? Why can we not call a spade a spade without fear of punishment, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. How can there be true freedom of speech when it's been restricted in some way?

All apartheid laws and practices shall be set aside.

Again it's simple to see they are not following their own core principles, AA/BEE.

The national wealth of our country, the heritage of South Africans, shall be restored to the people;

If the wealth of the country is to be restored to the people, why then are the vast majority of people in South Africa living in poverty and the rulers and politicians of the country living in wealth? The rich are getting richer, the poor are getting poorer.

The mineral wealth beneath the soil, the Banks and monopoly industry shall be transferred to the ownership of the people as a whole;

Here's where communism takes a role, in other words they want mining, banking and monopoly industry (See Telkom, ESKOM) to be nationalised. So why then have they not nationalised the mines and the banks yet. Guys, if you're going to live by your core principles do so,don't pussy-foot around. (Of course we know what nationalisation means don't we?)

All other industry and trade shall be controlled to assist the wellbeing of the people;

All other industry and trade controlled to assist the well being of the people? Get rid of AA/BEE and it would be a step in the right direction.

All people shall have equal rights to trade where they choose, to manufacture and to enter all trades, crafts and professions.

I'm sure that this core principle is not being adhered to. Wouldn't you say? I mean after all I can just imagine opening a White Pride office at Luthuli House, I bet that won't be legal...

Restrictions of land ownership on a racial basis shall be ended, and all the land re-divided amongst those who work it to banish famine and land hunger;

The land is being redivided to people yes, but it's being given to those who do not work it for the benefit of all, just for themselves. In the cases of them trying to work it for the greater good of all they are failing miserably. (Black Farmers).

The state shall help the peasants with implements, seed, tractors and dams to save the soil and assist the tillers;

Peasants? I thought everyone was equal? What defines a peasant? The government is going to provide these people with implements, seeds, tractors and dams to save the soil? The soil doesn't need saving, the white farmers were doing fine until now. Oh I get it, they thought the NP government did the same for the white farmers, and that's why the farmers were so successful, it had nothing to do with working their asses off. I can just picture it, in a few years time when the black farmers first harvest fails (which it more than likely will) and they have not made money they are going back to the government for more help.

Freedom of movement shall be guaranteed to all who work on the land;

So what about those people who don't work the land? I thought everyone was equal?

All shall have the right to occupy land wherever they choose;

Rather worrying this one isn't it? Of course this is already happening all over. Squatter camp anyone? This needs to be tested though. What happens if a group of like minded white people decided to choose a lush piece of land and then develop their own community there?

I could go on and on and on about the Freedom Charter, I'm not being lazy by stopping here. I want people to see the Freedom Charter for what it is. To draw their own conclusions about various principles in the charter.

All in all it's a very irresponsible document. I believe along with a few other factors the charter is the reason South Africa is the shit-hole it is today. Promises made, promises that could never possibly be kept, promises that ensure that the ANC would be voted into power straight away, not for the enrichment of the people but rather for the enrichment for the political leaders, at the expense of the white South African.

It's time for all white South Africans to make a stand, to show the world that the ANC is no better than the NP, in fact they are far worse considering their Marxist tendencies.

The Case for Apartheid 2.0

Note:
Please note all the factual definitions have been taken from one source (Wikipedia) and as such are published in grey. My comments are published in green.

Firstly lets deal with the meaning of apartheid and what constitutes the crime of apartheid.

According to the 2002 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court it established the crime of apartheid as inhumane acts of a character similar to other crimes against humanity "committed in the context of an institutionalised regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime." It lists such crimes as murder, enslavement, deprivation of physical liberty, forced relocation, sexual violence and collective persecution.

I'm going to attempt to show in the context of present day South Africa how Apartheid (2.0) is still in existence today (against whites). It's going to be a long article so I suggest you sit down with a cup of tea/coffee a Klippies & Coke or whatever takes your fancy.

Crimes Against Humanity
As defined by the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Explanatory Memorandum "are particularly odious offences in that they constitute a serious attack on human dignity or grave humiliation or a degradation of one or more human beings. They are not isolated or sporadic events, but are part either of a government policy (although the perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy) or of a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority. Murder, extermination, torture, rape, political, racial, or religious persecution and other inhumane acts reach the threshold of crimes against humanity only if they are part of a widespread or systematic practice. Isolated inhumane acts of this nature may constitute grave infringements of human rights, or depending on the circumstances, war crimes, but may fall short of falling into the category of crimes under discussion."

Human Dignity
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights states:
Article 1. All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Article 2. Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Oppression
The definition of Oppression is: 1. the exercise of authority or power in a burdensome, cruel, or unjust manner. 2. an act or instance of oppressing. 3. the state of being oppressed. 4. the feeling of being heavily burdened, mentally or physically, by troubles, adverse conditions, anxiety, etc.Social oppression has in recent times been an epiphenomenon of various types of social dysfunction, whereby discrimination against an identified group is stimulated, encouraged and reinforced by way of promoting antagonism towards the Other. The term itself is derived, in a direct experiential sense, from the sensation of being pushed or lifted up by a greatly superior force.

Racial Group
The term race or racial group usually refers to the categorization of humans into populations or groups on the basis of various sets of heritable characteristics. The most widely used human racial categories are based on salient traits (especially skin color cranial or facial features and hair texture), and self-identification.

Murder
Murder, as defined in common law countries, is the unlawful killing of another human being with intent (or malice aforethought), and generally this state of mind distinguishes murder from other forms of unlawful homicide

Liberty
Liberty is a concept of political philosophy and identifies the condition in which an individual has the right to act according to his or her own will

Forced Relocation
Population transfer is the movement of a large group of people from one region to another by state policy or international authority, most frequently on the basis of ethnicity or religion. Banishment or exile is a similar process, but is forcibly applied to individuals and groups. Often the affected population is transferred by force to a distant region, perhaps not suited to their way of life, causing them substantial harm. In addition, the loss of all immovable property and, when forced, the loss of substantial amounts of movable property, is implied.

Sexual Violence
Sexual violence occurs throughout the world, although in most countries there has been little research conducted on the problem. Due to the private nature of sexual violence, estimating the extent of the problem is difficult. Research in South Africa and Tanzania suggests that nearly one in four women may experience sexual violence by an intimate partner, and up to one-third of adolescent girls report their first sexual experience as being forced.
Sexual violence is defined as:
any sexual act, attempt to obtain a sexual act, unwanted sexual comments or advances, or acts to traffic, or otherwise directed, against a person’s sexuality using coercion, by any person regardless of their relationship to the victim, in any setting, including but not limited to home and work.
Forms and contexts of sexual violence:
A wide range of sexually violent acts can take place in different circumstances and settings. These include, for example:

• Rape by strangers;
• rape within marriage or dating relationships;
• systematic "war rape" during armed conflict;
• unwanted sexual advances or sexual harassment, including demanding sex in return for favors;
• sexual abuse of mentally or physically disabled people;
• sexual abuse of children;
• forced marriage or cohabitation, including the marriage of children;
• denial of the right to use contraception or to adopt other measures to protect against sexually transmitted diseases;
• forced abortion;
• violent acts against sexual integrity, including genital mutilation and obligatory inspections for virginity
• forced prostitution and trafficking of people for the purpose of sexual exploitation

Collective Persecution
Collective punishment is the punishment of a group of people as a result of the behaviour of one or more other individuals or groups. The punished group may often have no direct association with the other individuals or groups, or direct control over their actions. In times of war and armed conflict, collective punishment has resulted in atrocities, and is a violation of the laws of war and the Geneva Conventions. Historically, occupying powers have used collective punishment to retaliate against and deter attacks on their forces by resistance movements (e.g. destroying whole towns and villages where attacks have taken place).

It is my belief that the government of South Africa is complicit in the current crimes against humanity. Humanity in this case is my culture, white South African. How is the government complicit I hear you ask? Well if you don't follow events closely in South Africa then I'll excuse you, for now anyway. The current government has in effect turned a blind eye to crime, whether it is intentional or not is not the point. I happen to believe (as do a great deal many) that it is intentional, and as such is defined as a crime against humanity.

Please refer back to the above "attack on human dignity or grave humiliation or a degradation of one or more human beings. They are not isolated or sporadic events, but are part either of a government policy (although the perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy) or of a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority." In this case there is a wide practice of atrocities and the government indeed does condone, or at the bare minimum tolerates them.

This is clearly evident, in so much as they haven't done anything constructive to stem the tide of crime. In fact since the current government has been in control crime has increased. One only has to read one or two bits from the list: murder, rape, torture and racial or religious persecution. One only has to pop on over to the SAPS (South African Police Service) website and peruse through the crime statistics to know things are really bad. There has been some controversy as of late, it appears that the SAPS figures cannot be trusted entirely since it's been found that station commanders are throwing dockets away or downgrading some crimes. There are plenty of sources on the net for these statistics, the figures vary however they are all pretty scary.

When I talk about crime I am only referring to crime against the white South African, however it is very difficult to distinguish from the official figures which numbers are black and which numbers are white. Anecdotal evidence, news reports, eye witness accounts all point to a very large problem in South Africa where the white cultural group have become easy targets.

Examining the stats for murder in South Africa is a very scary exercise indeed, since 1994 there have been many thousands if not hundreds of thousands of deaths. For now let's only concentrate on farm murders. There's a link on this blog that if you have never heard of will shock you I'm sure, since 1994 there have been some 3000 murders of white farmers and their families. For the most part these murders have been very savage, and there have been instances of rape, torture and needless violence.

This is South Africa's silent genocide. No one group of people has had to endure this savagery, and brutality more than them. These farmers traditionally are Afrikaaners, and I believe as others do that they are being singled out for "special treatment" by the criminals. Whether or not these criminals are part of a secret group of people endorsed by the government or are just black people singling out white people for punishment is not the point. The point is, it is black on white violence. Murder with racial motives. One of the very things that defines the crime of apartheid.

Oppression of white South Africans again is very evident a few examples:
AA/BEE: these policies are enforced by the government of South Africa to "right the wrongs of the past". In layman's terms black people are being given preferential treatment when it comes to employment, regardless of whether they are able to do the job or not. This has been the downfall of many a company and will be the downfall of many a company in the future. Considering that it's been 15 years since white sponsored apartheid ended a lot of people entering the current job market will be white South Africans who had nothing whatsoever to do with Apartheid 1.0, surely this is oppression of a racial group by another racial group.
Tax Payers: In South Africa, a good proportion of white South Africans are law abiding tax payers. Tax payers are funding government, para-statal companies (which incidentally are black run, either via AA/BEE or through nepotism and are failing miserably. Cue ESKOM, TELKOM, SABC, SAA. These companies are all channels for self enrichment for the governing classes (ie: Blacks). These once world class companies are now nothing more than feeding troughs for the gravy train passengers.

Tax payers money is going towards a multitude of things too, housing for the unemployed, free electricity and water for the unemployed, arms, funds for inauguration parties etc, etc ad infinitum. Pretty soon these white tax paying citizens will be no more, having been forced out of employment, will they be looked after as well as the current "disadvantaged"? Hazarding a guess I'd say no. So much for all men being equal and brotherhood (As per the Universal Declaration of Human Rights!) More importantly it is the oppression of one racial group over another, yet another factor that defines apartheid.

The government's failure to stem the tide of crime has also led to oppression of a vast majority of white South Africans, many thousands of families are living in what can only be classed as self imposed imprisonment. Drive through previous white residential areas and you can see this first hand. Six foot walls, sprinkled with a dash of barbed wire/electrified fencing, infra-red beam protected gardens and homes, windows and doors protected by burglar bars and security fencing, automatic gates, the list goes on. A vast number of whites also carry/own fire-arms contrary to the black governments attempts to dis-arm the general public. These people's liberty has been taken away for fear of attack or far, far worse.

The subject of forced relocation for me is a touchy one. To most people my justification for forced relocation is at worst sketchy and at best a very valid point in proving that white South Africans are indeed being persecuted via a new form of Apartheid. In the "Bad Old Days" forced relocation involved shipping groups of black people to areas defined by the government. The governmnent tried to group these people by tribal affiliation in these respective areas. The government even gave them a choice to declare these homelands independent. Where else in the world have you ever heard of a government offering different ethnicities the chance to declare independence? And then to be criticised by the first world for doing so? In those days if the blacks had chosen independence/autonomy they would be way better off today than they actually are. However according to the ICC this forced relocation was illegal and morally wrong.

Which brings me to my point (finally I hear you say). Since 1994 over a million South Africans, for the large part white South Africans have emigrated to other first world countries, fleeing crime, fleeing the oppression of AA/BEE or to broaden their horizons. The latter I believe is more the exception than the rule. The government's failure or disinterest in fighting crime has resulted in one ethnic group being oppressed, and as a result found pastures greener.In fact they have left these white South Africans no other choice but to move to another country proving that it is indeed a forced relocation. Another notch on the bedpost towards Apartheid 2.0. There are many people in South Africa that will not have the opportunity to emigrate, and I dread to think what their future holds. It is up to us expats to help them out (This will be the topic for another post in the near future).

The last point in my claim that white South Africans are suffering under Apartheid 2.0 is an emotive and controversial one, sexual violence. South Africa is the one of the rape/sexually violent capitals of the world with one in four (maybe more since not all crimes are reported and the mere fact that some "dockets get lost") women is the victim of a sexual attack. Yes I know you're going to say but the vast majority of these crimes are inflicted on non-white South Africans, however that doesn't detract from the fact that a whole load of white women are victims too! Blacks by nature are a violent culture (See the rest of Africa for proof) so rape and sexual violence is the norm for them, however it is not the norm for whites.

The fact that there are so many attacks on women actually hides the fact that white women are being singled out, the statistics clouded by the sheer volume of the problem. As commonly decent men we are appalled that the women of our culture are victims, of course we are, however we should also be appalled that if some statistics are to be believed one in four men is also sexually violent (There are of course cases where white men are guilty as sin). In other words our women are being victimised and are as such being victimised on the account of their skin colour. The men however are also being oppressed/victimised by unwillingly being part of a statistic that is frankly disgusting. We are being tarred with the same brush as the black savages. Two points to further my case for proving that Apartheid 2.0 is a real living, breathing thing.

I have as yet never seen or heard of a white man raping a black woman, no doubt there are some cases (psychologically damaged liberals no doubt), likewise there are cases of white men raping white women, there's no denying that. Each culture has it's rotten apples, there is no doubt about that. I am not one of those rotten apples and nor are the majority of white men.

So there in one big lump is my case, or proof if you will that Apartheid still by legal definition exists in South Africa today. What can we do about it? I'm not sure, but I will discuss that in a future post. Apartheid 1.0 was beaten by relatively non-violent means, and I believe so can Apartheid 2.0, however at what cost?

About this Blog

This blog was set up for many reasons, it would be totally remiss of me not to at least list the most relevant reasons:

• Regardless of what the MSM leads you to believe Apartheid still exists in South Africa. The world was duped into believing South Africa is/was a multicultural Utopia. Guess what? It's not, never was and never will be. I will show that here.
  
• Apartheid has evolved, those who were the oppressors are now the victims, and of course the victims have now become the oppressors. However like I said, Apartheid has evolved, and done so very well, it's conveniently slipped under the MSM radar and as a result South Africa is undergoing a silent genocide, never mind become one of the most crime ridden countries on the planet. A very far cry from how it used to be. Again I will show that here.
  
• This blog will set out to prove that Apartheid 2.0 is alive and well, using the exact definitions that the U.N and other major countries of the world used to make us White South Africans the pariahs of the world.
• I want this blog to bring real news to the world, unlike the MSM in South Africa who conveniently do not cover crime like they should. I want the world to sit up and wake up to the fact that "The Rainbow Nation" is not going to last forever, not under the current circumstances anyway. The South African government conveniently have laws in place to stop the media reporting on the racial background of criminals, they know the truth, so we should too. (Although it's not hard to guess who the culprits are.

Of course I will also post personal points of view and such like. That will do for now. If anyone would like to help contribute to the site please let me know and we can come to an arrangement. If anyone wants to use any material from this site please feel free to do so but at least either credit me with the work or back link to this blog.

What is Apartheid 2.0?
I've been an avid reader of quite a few blogs and forums (South African related) on the net over the last few years, have never really contributed much to them bar an odd comment here and there. Over time it has become evident to me that Apartheid is still alive and well in South Africa albeit in a different form to the one the world knows about.

I therefore coined the term Apartheid 2.0 (If someone else came up with this term before my apologies) as in a newer, sleeker model of the old one. It's been a gradual realisation over the last few years, you see, I no longer live in South Africa so my finger was not on the pulse of matters so to speak. Of course it's still not quite on the pulse but I'm getting there. However sometimes it's wise to take a step back and look at the bigger picture, being in Europe I think is a big enough step back don't you think?

It's become blatantly obvious that the policies, corruption, the out right racism and incompetence of the South African government is steering my beloved country of birth in the same direction as the rest of Africa. What is also worrying is how quickly it seems to be happening. Although South Africa is still far from full on anarchy it doesn't take a fool to know that if things go on as they are, my fellow countrymen are soon going to be living in even bleaker times than they already are.

How can we fix this? I'm afraid to say I don't think this is possible, and no this is not an expat being the stereotypical doomsayer, it's simple logic. Hopefully I will be able to show you why I think this way in an eloquent manner. I'm not a seasoned blogger, nor do I claim to speak for the people that all comes with time and I'm sure (actually I'm hoping) that I get a large enough following, with followers who can give constructive criticism as well as help me in my endeavor to inform the world.

With this in mind I have enabled the comments section to all, however each and every comment will be reviewed before it is published. Yes a little bit of censorship however as long as comments are kept on topic I'm sure we will all get along just dandy. You will notice the blog is very plain at the moment. There is a specific reason for this. I don't envision the blog lasting on blogspot very long so I'm in the process of finding a permanent home and as soon as I do so will move everything over.